$2,000 FREE on your first deposit*Please note: this bonus offer is for members of the VIP player's club only and it's free to joinJust a click to Join!
Exclusive VIPSpecial offer

🍒 Who is David Peat? The Wild, Crazy, and Unconventional "Viffer" - David Peat Poker Net Worth

2020 viffer poker thanks for explanation
  • Licensed and certified online casino
  • 100% safe and secure
  • Players welcome!
  • Exclusive member's-only bonus
  • 97% payout rates and higher

Viffer poker 2020

Sign-up for real money play!Open Account and Start Playing for Real

Free play here on endless game variations of the Wheel of Fortune slots

  • Spectacular wheel of wealthSpectacular wheel of wealth
  • Fortune CookieFortune Cookie
  • Wheel of Fortune HollywoodWheel of Fortune Hollywood
  • Wheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme SpinWheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme Spin
  • Wheel of CashWheel of Cash
  • Wheel of WealthWheel of Wealth

Play slots for real money

  1. Make depositDeposit money using any of your preferred deposit methods.
  2. Start playingClaim your free deposit bonus cash and start winning today!
  3. Open accountComplete easy registration at a secure online casino website.
Register with the Casino

VIP Players Club

Join the VIP club to access members-only benefits.Join the club to receive:
  • Monthly drawings
  • Unlimited free play
  • Loyalty rewards
  • Exclusive bonuses
  • Slot tournaments
Join the Club!

who is david peat and what screenname does he plays online? little has been known to his success in wsop and did he win on hsp? i saw a ... Click to Play!

The latest Tweets from David Peat (@4viffer): "if anyone knows how to use auto hot key please dm me" Click to Play!

On May 20th, Upswing Poker featured pro Doug Polk began his live Twitch Poker Stream. VIDEO: Mercier and Polk Feud — PokerNews (May 30, 2016).. (1:35:15) David Viffer stories?. Hit And Run: Triton Poker Releases 2020 Teaser Trailer; MPN UCOP Back For Its Grand Finale On January 19th. Click to Play!

David Peat's viffer Results, Stats, Gallery & Pictures. Click to Play!


Fights Breaking Out All Over the Place in the Poker World


1.) To horribly outdraw an opponant, pref in a limit-poker game. 2.) To insert a pool Cue into a young lady, pref while drunk.
At the top of their game, professional poker players earn millions in tournament cashes, tour successes and high stakes grinding in the card rooms along the ...
On May 20th, Upswing Poker featured pro Doug Polk began his live Twitch Poker Stream. VIDEO: Mercier and Polk Feud — PokerNews (May 30, 2016).. (1:35:15) David Viffer stories?. Hit And Run: Triton Poker Releases 2020 Teaser Trailer; MPN UCOP Back For Its Grand Finale On January 19th.


"The one that kept her alive."


Urban Dictionary: Viffed Viffer poker 2020


On top of all of this Cates also has something to say about David 'Viffer' Peat who he's got a large side action with. Being Owed $1,900,000.
If you know of Red Chip Poker, you probably know of Persuadeo.. I remember a televised cash game where Viffer complained he only knew ...
While you may go straight to PokerSchoolOnline.com or click through direct to look at the fantastic tuition videos at PokerStars.tv, the ...



David "Viffer" Peat is lonely - Poker Advice - PocketFives


viffer poker 2020
Arguably even more worrying were the pros from Las Vegas: mathematics prodigies like David "Viffer" Peat (his nickname alluding to a slang term for sex with a ...
The latest poker podcasts from the pokerfuse podcast directory. We sit.. Viffer seen playing 5-10 NL in cardroom, looking old (3:56:10). WSOP ...

viffer poker 2020 It looks like you're new here.
If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I have in the past learned a great deal in the CLP forums and think they have a lot of value to subscribers, and I appreciate the community.
With the demands of teaching middle school band full time, teaching private oboe lessons, being in the OR National Guard band, playing poker 1-2 times a week usually once a week now sadly.
I still peruse Slack from time to time, but my forum time went away.
slots code prime 2020 bonus barely get time to watch videos, although I listen to all the podcasts thanks to time in my car with my iPhone.
I miss the forums, and I will try to come over from time to time.
I've had a topic on my mind lately and I though I'd post it here in CLP.
Feel free to move it to the appropriate thread if this is not the place for it.
As I've watched some of these bigger LATB games with super crushers, I've been thinking about what traits make someone a super-user, world-class soul crusher vs.
What traits does Garrett have that other solid winning players don't have?
I can't imagine they study any more than any of the pros on this site do.
Are there personality traits that set them apart?
Are the super-crushers' winning traits learn-able?
If so, why haven't I learned those traits?
Or how do I learn viffer poker 2020 traits?
Can any of us adopt those winning traits, or are they only available to some?
It seems so intangible why guys like Garret and Andy are such super-crushers, it's like I can't put my finger on what sets them apart.
I know it's not just bankroll, although I'm sure being over-rolled helps.
I think it's more than just being over-rolled though, I just don't know what it is, or go here it's learn-able.
What do you guys think?
Are the pros here, whom I respect greatly and have learned a TON from every time I listen to a podcast, just as good as the super-crushers I see on LATB minus the bankroll to play in massive games?
When I watch Garrett, I just want to play like him, that's all.
Is that too much to ask for this holiday season?
Cheers, Chris I think Garrett is by far the best.
Andi doesn't seem good and Art used to be a decent 5-10 winner played with him a good amount.
IMO it's mainly a bankroll issue, the better players on 5-10 and most regs on 10-20 could certainly beat the game if they had the roll.
If you want to learn technical solid poker, DON'T WATCH LIVE POKER.
Perhaps it's not so much a technical advantage the crushers have, it could be more an experience advantage.
IMO, I disagree with you that these players don't study as much as you, I, or a majority of people on this forum.
I think players like Garrett, Berkey and other are CONSTANTLY studying away from the table.
In addition to playing a regular game with the same players, they are certainly aware of their opponents style of play, their ranges, etc.
I would be confident in saying that they have a routine preparation for the game, and a plan how to play against each opponent in the lineup of that game.
I hope Bart chimes in and can give us an idea what he does or if he has some insider knowledge how these players have developed their skillset.
If you view yourself as an alpha dog, you are more likely to play with confidence, put people in tough spots, shrug off bad plays, be able to make good decisions in tough spots, etc.
Just imagine the opposite.
If someone is more of a beta or passive type of personality, they are more likely to play with fear, passivity, and get flustered in confrontational moments.
The three guys that you have mentioned here all play different styles.
I played with Art for years at 5-10, and probably have done a 100 hours of commentary on him playing the big game.
His game has changed drastically and I think that he is the most common regular that attempts to play equilibrium or GTO.
To the point where he might actually give up some EV by not adjusting to softer lineups.
Take a look at his preflop stats of less than 20% VPIP and the amount that he checks post flop.
Garret is more of a live, feel player.
He puts a ton of pressure on guys and is clearly comfortable with playing super high stakes.
He probably has the MOST live experience at nosebleed stakes which is different than comparing him to someone who has played millions of hands online.
The spots are just different.
The pressure, the pace of the game, etc.
And Andy is sort of a combination of both guys.
He has cleaned up his game preflop a lot but is certainly capable of putting huge pressure on his opponents.
But the experience factor is what makes these guys a cut above the rest.
They may have jobs and other responsibilities.
Maybe can chime in here as well.
BartI think it's very common for people to get the perception that people who play at high stakes on TV are great players.
This is far from the truth.
I used to think that most of the guys on High Stakes Poker were great players, but I realized that a lot of them were actually really bad.
This is akin to people thinking someone like David Peat Viffer is good because they play in the highest stakes.
A lot of these guys got their money from other sources to bankroll these huge games.
Lucky hit in tournaments, sports bet, or other things.
In my opinion, Berkey is not a good player at all.
He is fundamentally sloppy and his live game is not even sharp.
He is a spot in these high stakes games and I would actually be happy to have him in the games that I play.
I have put in decent hours with Andy, Garrett, Brian Kim, and Art.
Andy is not a super crusher.
He just buys in for heaps and has a mean poker face.
He comes from a ton of money and he's been on an unbelievable heater.
He can definitely spew and tilt.
Garrett also comes from a lot of money and he made heaps during the golden years of poker.
I do give Garrett credit for being very aggressive, fearless, and having good card sense, and he can put you in some rough spots.
But he also can definitely be sloppy and spewy, and I don't consider him to be the best player.
He destroys fish, but in a solid line up, he is an underdog.
Some regs look to play with Garrett because he is so sloppy and leaks money in different spots.
Art is very solid and plays GTO, and I have a lot of respect for his game, and he worked hard.
But he was also on a massive heater and had two huge tournament scores that boosted his bankroll to play the biggest games.
Brian Kim is solid and is legit good.
He is similar to Art in style and skills.
To be completely honest, I don't think that these players are on "another level" so to speak.
But even him, I don't think that he's like the Michael Jordan of poker or anything.
Often they got their money from different sources which enables them to play nose bleed stakes.
Sometimes TV can make people look larger than life.
These are great comments, thanks to everyone so far.
Yes, the TV thing can sometimes be seductive in terms of boosting someone's apparent skill level, very true.
Why do you think Ryan moved away from the old model where anyone can play on the show?
I've played on it 3 times and it was really fun all three times.
Although the third time, when Ryan was running the show, was my least favorite time.
The character definitely changed from the old days with Lizette and Tuchman and Limon and Bart, those were the good ol' days.
It was much more rec-friendly, and there was a big game maybe once in a while, and that was it.
If you were out of town and traveling to LA, they'd always get you on the show, hold your seat, treat you like you were special.
Now, it's almost like a "celebrity" mutual admiration society.
Maybe this iteration of LATB will also run it's course and it will go back to the older days of lower limits and more rec-friendly games.
I watched Berkey's strat videos on LATB, and his analysis seems sound, deep, and thorough, even though in real time he looks like he spews a lot.
Also, he owns his mistakes or misplayed hands, and is capable of self-reflection, which are all reasons I thought he was a crusher.
I would have never thought that people would think Berkey is a spot at the table considering the spots he viffer poker 2020 certain players in.
I would hate to be OOP to Berkey at my table, I feel like I'd have to hang on tight and hero call my chips away.
He gave a great interview to Joey Ingram, worth checking out.
He mentions that he normally plays in huge games, so he must have got his money from somewhere if he is not a winning NL player.
I assumed he was a big winner after listening to his analysis, but I guess I was mistaken.
Art does seem tight, maybe too tight, but he often couples that with sick aggression on later streets when he thinks he has a good handle on his opponents' ranges.
Andy also seems really good, like you said.
I would not want Garrett at my table, except to have good conversation and to entertain.
He seems the most like a home game player to me, someone who knows how to keep everyone happy.
I heard Garrett was a heads up online NL specialist and crusher back in the day, and that experience must be worth something.
As for Art and Andy, neither one would get invited to home games, at least up here, because they don't interact much with other people.
I'm not sure how they get to be celebs on LATB when they don't barely say two words in an entire show, but I'm not the producer so what do I know.
Maybe they've ingratiated themselves with Ryan.
As a poker fan, and as someone who plays a lot of poker, I do enjoy watching these guys put people in the blender in big spots with big bets both in terms of big blinds and in terms of real money.
Watching Garrett overcall the button with AhAc and then get put in the blender on a T65hh board when getting pressure is fun here watch.
I guess some of these guys have a massive disregard for the real value of money to be poo-ing around at these stakes.
I can't even imagine how much money I would need to have in order to poo around with these guys.
It would be in the millions, that's for sure.
If you view yourself as an alpha dog, you are more likely to play with confidence, put people in tough spots, shrug off bad plays, be able to make good decisions in tough spots, etc.
Just imagine the opposite.
If someone is more of a beta or passive type of personality, they are more likely to play with fear, passivity, and get flustered in confrontational moments.
This is a great point.
I am certainly not one those hyper competitive alpha-dog types in life, and I'm not that way at the poker table either.
I'm thoughtful, but not fearless.
In the face of aggression, I tend to take more passive lines.
Maybe this is a leak in my game.
Maybe in the face of aggression, I need to respond with more aggression.
This will increase volatility, but I will also increase my chances of having big winning sessions.
Is that a character viffer poker 2020 This web page need to adopt in order to be a crusher?
Do you have this,?
Have you seen people develop this trait?
And many others too - great topic guys.
Seems click at this page Bart is right too about experience and the skill that comes with it.
Bankroll is a huge part and players' willingness to put large percentages of their bankroll on the table.
Berkey has admitted before, on video, that he has had huge portions of his bankroll in play.
Although, I don't think you can discount the hard work guys like Garrett, Art and Brian Kim have put into the game.
Garrett definitely has a method to his madness.
What he gives up pre flop, he thinks he can more than make up with image and a wide range post flop.
One of the toughest games I ever played in was with Garrett, DGAF, Andy, and Esko back in the day.
Berkey has a backer.
Andy, less than 2 years ago, was a spot in a tough line-up in my opinion.
He was incredibly unbalanced on the turn and river.
I've probably played with him the most out of everyone, aside from maybe Art.
His hyper aggressive style was incredibly hard to deal with when he wasn't tilting from around 2008-2016.
He clearly has worked hard on his game and made a lot of adjustments.
I think playing on LATB consistently has helped him.
Art is pretty young and came up learning from the new school approach to poker.
I think it helped him, because he was ahead of the curve.
That said, I think his mental makeup in general helped as well.
The kind of guy, who doesn't really slow down even when hes stuck or right after he got caught bluffing.
He was generally hyper focused and didn't give in or soft play source all.
That speaks to the right kind of mental make-up you need to be a crusher.
He was definitely cocky too.
I thought he was a spot when casino bonuses free spins first showed up, and he probably was, until he put it all together.
He plays tight on the LATB shows, because thats probably optimal full ring when the other guys are wagging their dicks around pre.
As for myself, I am hyper competitive for sure.
I wouldn't describe myself as a crusher though.
When I'm playing my A game, I definitely try to make myself feel confident and like I'm the best at the table even though, I know Im probably not.
Its just an attitude and a mindset.
I get that from playing music and playing in front of thousands of people year after year.
I ususally shrug off nervousness by literally looking out into the crowd and saying "fuck you, I dont care what you think, I'm going to play my ass off" or something like that, haha.
My main problem is that I don't play for a living and do really well monetarily playing music, so its easy for me to just coast and play my B game.
Although lately I've been trying to fix that.
Inherently, I don't think I have the same alpha dog personality that I've described though.
I have different kinds of intangibles and it viffer poker 2020 from being a super sensitive and hyper aware of other people's energy.
Probably honed from years of playing music.
I suspect Garrett is similar in that regard.
I think this can easily be summed up by saying what looks good on TV, does not necessarly translate to a winning hourly rate.
We are privy to a large degree to knowing how much Bart and Ki win in these games.
We dont have any hard numbers about how much any of the other players make, or even if they win at all.
I would say both Bart and Ki are the "nits" at the Live at the Bike table.
Thats what wins at live Poker.
Being a crusher isnt getting someone to fold top pair, being a crusher is folding middle set when you know it isnt good, preserve your stack and save 150BB, but every other "pro" will just go broke in that spot and call it a cooler.
I think this can easily be summed up by saying what looks good on TV, does not necessarly translate to a winning hourly rate.
We are privy to a large degree to knowing how much Bart and Ki win in these games.
We dont have any hard numbers about how much any of the other players make, or even if they win at all.
I would say both Bart and Ki are the "nits" at the Live at the Bike table.
Thats what wins at live Poker.
Being a crusher isnt getting someone to fold top pair, being a crusher is folding middle set when you know it isnt good, preserve your stack and save 150BB, but every other "pro" will just go broke in that spot and call it a cooler.
BTW, I have been continuously hammered for being a "nit" in the LATB chat box on the ante game.
However even though I consistently viffer poker 2020 one of the lowest VPIPs it is still extremely loose for full ring standards, usually 25-30%.
Compare that to Art in the Friday game who commonly plays under 20% and where the highest VPIP for the entire table is sometimes as low as 35%.
Bart I would say the key quality to top players is being able to constantly make adjustments to your game better and 2020 hiring casino junket than your opponents.
Recognizing how they are playing and having a plan of attack to take advantage of the weaknesses in their play style.
The great thing about NLHE, is that you can induce players to make mistakes.
You can counter their play.
If playing against a nit, you should be able to induce folding errors.
Against a guy that likes to steal "punish the limpers", you can set him up.
You don't want just a "GTO" style for the game, but rather play in a way that is GTO against how your opponents play.
Ive been thinking a lot recently about a few pros I have know for more than 10 years who, IMO, have very poor fundamental skill and are not even that good at game selecting.
I figured I ought to study them to see if they are doing something I am missing.
They all have in common that they have very good people reading skills.
Not so much hand reading skills, but they can detect player patterns and the know how to exploit strength and weakness.
When someone has those skills and great fundamentals its an amazing combination.
IMV working on reading opponents and figuring out their patterns is as important as fundamentals - thought we should to both - it does seem you can even be pretty bad at fundamentals if you are great at reading patterns and people - at least up to mid stakes.
THose guys get get crushed when they move up coin hack apk higher stakes viffer poker 2020.


David "Viffer" Peat vs. Neil Channing


130 131 132 133 134

David Viffer played 48 hours straight and walked away the big winner of the PartyPoker Big Game IV.. That is what the audience will take from David "Viffer" Peat who used.. 2003-2020 PokerNews.com All rights reserved.


COMMENTS:


12.12.2019 in 12:40 Malaran:

It is remarkable, very useful phrase



15.12.2019 in 02:19 Vokus:

I have not understood, what you mean?



20.12.2019 in 05:00 Kazijind:

In my opinion you are not right. I am assured.



12.12.2019 in 07:12 Vijas:

I recommend to you to look in google.com



17.12.2019 in 02:01 Grolkis:

I am sorry, that has interfered... At me a similar situation. It is possible to discuss. Write here or in PM.



20.12.2019 in 20:33 Akizshura:

I am am excited too with this question. You will not prompt to me, where I can find more information on this question?



18.12.2019 in 14:19 Dolmaran:

Brilliant idea and it is duly



18.12.2019 in 22:53 Kagakora:

Amazingly! Amazingly!



11.12.2019 in 18:04 Shakakazahn:

I can not take part now in discussion - there is no free time. Very soon I will necessarily express the opinion.



17.12.2019 in 18:29 Shagul:

Well! Do not tell fairy tales!



13.12.2019 in 21:19 Gugul:

On mine the theme is rather interesting. I suggest you it to discuss here or in PM.



18.12.2019 in 20:52 Fenrikora:

What words...



11.12.2019 in 15:27 Mogrel:

The intelligible message



17.12.2019 in 16:54 Najora:

I think, that you are mistaken. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM.



17.12.2019 in 02:14 Tern:

Excuse, it is cleared



19.12.2019 in 02:42 Voodoosho:

It only reserve



14.12.2019 in 06:09 Mauzahn:

I regret, but nothing can be made.



14.12.2019 in 08:40 Goltilabar:

What words... super



11.12.2019 in 22:58 Kigalabar:

In my opinion you are not right. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



12.12.2019 in 00:53 Gakora:

What interesting message



15.12.2019 in 07:11 Meztinos:

I think, that you are mistaken. I can defend the position.



17.12.2019 in 17:56 Gardagar:

For a long time I here was not.



19.12.2019 in 15:12 Kiganris:

You were not mistaken, truly



11.12.2019 in 11:42 Gagar:

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.



15.12.2019 in 11:06 Fenrikora:

Shine



14.12.2019 in 04:46 Mooguran:

I can recommend to come on a site, with a large quantity of articles on a theme interesting you.



13.12.2019 in 19:02 Mazragore:

Can be.




Total 27 comments.